Should journalists accept fellowships from Organic Trade Association, Monsanto?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Can journalists be impartial when their training is being paid for by the very industry they cover?

That’s the question I asked myself when I came across this upcoming journalist training, on the National Press Foundation (NPF) website — “Exploring the Future of Food and Agriculture.”

. . . .

At first, I assumed the reporters receiving the fellowship were having their expenses paid for by the NPF. But scrolling down the page, I learned that wasn’t the case:

Funding for this training is provided by Monsanto, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Pork Board, and the Organic Trade Association.

. . . .

. . . .[T]o see journalists stepping into [a] funding quagmire by accepting an all expenses paid fellowship from the very companies and trade groups they are supposed to cover without bias is distressing.

. . . .

If we want to keep food and agriculture journalism impartial and trustworthy, reporters should never accept any kind of funding or compensation from the industries they cover. . . .

Read full, original post: Monsanto And The Organics Industry Pay To Train Journalists: What Could Go Wrong?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.