Scannable GMO labels could provide information regarding sustainability, pesticide use

| | July 13, 2016
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

I believe in transparency in the food system. However, information must be meaningful to be useful. . . .

That is why keeping open the option of QR codes. . . looks promising. People care about GMOs because they are concerned about . . . healthfulness . . .and . . . environmental sustainability . . . Establishing this. . . requires more than a GMO/non-GMO label.

A fuller disclosure might tell you that the crop had an insect-resistance trait that allowed fewer insecticides to be sprayed . . . . Or . . . that a herbicide-tolerant crop was grown using glyphosate, and spell out the pluses and minuses. . .

The problem with a straight “GMO” label is that it appears to many as a health warning, yet we know . . . that there are no health concerns about GMO technology. . . .

Related article:  Viewpoint: Hidden conflicts of interest cripple IARC's biased glyphosate-cancer evaluation

. . . .

. . . . The most potent argument that the anti-GMO activists ever came up with is the “public right to know,” . . .

Defusing this issue means putting as much information as possible into the public domain. Telling people that experts say their food is safe does not help . . . in today’s cynical world. People will only feel . . . that their food is safe when they are able to choose what they eat.

Read full, original post: Time for a compromise on GMO labelling

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend