The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our Annual Report.

Members of Congress want answers on EPA’s delayed evaluation of glyphosate

| | September 6, 2016

When Congress reconvenes [in September], lawmakers will continue to press the Environmental Protection Agency about why it’s withholding their report that says glyphosate, the world’s most popular weed killer, does not cause cancer. . . .

Some on Capitol Hill think the EPA’s foot-dragging is politically motivated. Glyphosate is the latest target of the global environmental movement because it’s applied to genetically engineered crops that environmentalists oppose (both are manufactured by Monsanto). Glyphosate is also safely used on conventional farms, open spaces and home gardens around the world.

. . . .

The stakes are high for the agency’s outcome as activists pressure lawmakers here and around the world to curtail glyphosate’s use. . . .

Related article:  Massive data do not support Don Huber's GMO/glyphosate pathogen claims

Activists here are also trying to sway public policy. . . .

All of these efforts hinge on proving glyphosate is dangerous. An EPA imprimatur that the herbicide is safe and doesn’t cause cancer would devastate the legislative and legal arguments against glyphosate here and abroad. Lawmakers are right to suspect politics is in play and should continue to push a pro-science, common sense and transparent approach by the EPA.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Political foot-dragging at EPA over controversial weed killer

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend