Viewpoint: Why the FDA should not be regulating genetically engineered animals (as drugs, no less)

atlantic salmon

[Editor’s note: Henry Miller is founding director of the FDA’s Office of Biotechnology. John Cohrssen is former counsel to the White House Biotechnology Working Group.]

[The FDA’s] review of the salmon as a “new animal drug” required [more than 20] years. At the end of its two-decades-long review, FDA concluded what had been obvious from the beginning: that no health or environmental risks or food quality concerns existed.

Because the FDA regulated the genetic insert in the Oxitec mosquito as a new animal drug, it, like other ‘drugs’, had to be shown to be safe and effective for the animal.

FDA’s failures in both policy formulation and in the actual reviews of the genetically engineered salmon and mosquito resulted from a lack of organizational expertise, technological skittishness, empire-building, and deference to political pressure. In contrast, USDA has a long history with genetically altered biocontrol agents, most notably the innovative screw-worm fly produced with sterile-insect techniques that was successfully developed by USDA >70 years ago to eradicate a devastating agricultural pest.

Withdrawing the FDA guidance and assigning jurisdiction to USDA would be a logical and important advance for agriculture, the environment, and public health. All that is needed to get it done is resolve from the Trump administration.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: FDA is the wrong agency to regulate genetically engineered animals (behind paywall)

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-8-2026-12_32_48-PM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS strikes a blow against junk science in Bayer glyphosate case. Will it deter mass tort litigators?
afb-a-b
As the EU loosens restrictions on agricultural gene editing, it remains years behind the rest of the world on equally-safe GMO foods
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-01_57_55-PM
Viewpoint: Europe’s rejection of air conditioning is the poster child for misunderstanding how to mitigate the impact of climate change
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-2.02.54-PM
Viewpoint: In abortion-restricting Florida, misinformation abounds when Republican congresswoman faces an ectopic pregnancy
Screen-Shot-at-PM-pe-vra-kipgaprbdo-vd-ms-jpule-n-jqqaxf-l-e
Viewpoint: Will new breeding techniques help make European agriculture more competitive?
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-3.25.10-PM
Using AI for health questions? Here are 4 tips for the most accurate answers.
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-3.10.50-PM
Snake-oil cures throughout history
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-12.55.21-PM
Cancer health facts are particularly susceptible to online misinformation
Screenshot-2026-07-08-at-2.14.27-PM
Belief in unproven dietary regimes, vitamins, and crank therapies is putting patients’ health in danger and increasing the risk of getting cancer
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-03_33_49-PM
‘Alternative’ cancer treatments that could kill you
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-10_27_31-AM
Viewpoint: Europe clears the way for gene-edited crops — but fear-driven restrictions still slow their full potential
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.