Do we need mandatory genetic screening of sperm donors?

M Id Sperm donor e

The multibillion-dollar sperm donation business has shockingly little oversight, leading to false promises of anonymity, insufficient medical testing and high numbers of half-siblings, according to advocates who are demanding more stringent regulation of the emotionally wrought fertility industry.

“They’re not creating gidgets and widgets. They’re creating human beings,” said Wendy Kramer, founder of the Donor Sibling Registry. “Because there’s a lack of oversight, it’s kind of a free-for-all. If we can’t be ethical in this area, where can we be ethical?”

Kramer and other members of the registry, a 50,000-member organization for donors and donor offspring, filed a petition last month to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asking the agency to consider a major expansion of those mandates, including:

  •  More comprehensive genetic and medical testing;
  •  Tracking and limiting the number of offspring per donor to reduce the number of half-siblings;
  •  Updated donor testing to track conditions that may develop over time;
  •  An end to donor anonymity.

In the past two years, the cryobank has added criminal background checks and psychological screening, as well as testing for 261 genetic mutations.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Special Report: Inside the billion dollar sperm donation business

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

wuhan institute of virology main entrance
​​COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-14-2026-09_41_44-AM-2
Viewpoint—‘The gleeful efficiency of an arsonist’: Administration’s health and science research cuts are ‘sabotaging’ America’s future
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-12_06_18-PM-2
Defying death: The immortality movement goes mainstream

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.