Fish genes in tomatoes? The GMO lie that just won’t die

Screen Shot at AM e

Editor’s note:ย Mary Mangan, Ph.D., received her education in microbiology, immunology, plant cell biology, and mammalian cell, developmental, and molecular biology

Besides celebrities, another group that has big megaphones are companies with marketing budgets. Just recently Stonyfield created a campaign with atrocious misinformation spewed by cute children.

[Editor’s note: Read the GLP’s coverage of the Stonyfield video fiasco here]

fish mythbuster e

[A]s wrong and stupid as that was, what really bothers me about Stonyfieldโ€™s nonsense is the downstream consequences of their false claims. The fish-mato particularly triggered me. I was recalling a story by Joe Schwarcz about a guy who came to one of his events: โ€œThere are No Fish Genes in Tomatoesโ€:

โ€œIf genetically modified foods were properly labeled, I could still eat tomatoes,โ€ was the angry remark. I was puzzled by this, but the gentleman went on to clarify. โ€œI have a fish allergy,โ€ he said, โ€œand I have no way of knowing which tomatoes have been modified with fish genes, so I just donโ€™t eat any tomato products.โ€

What happened here? A guy was misled by the claims of the anti-GMO folks and has been avoiding a healthy food for years โ€” based on a lie. This is one case, but we hear this all the time from the food-fearful that are carrying a lot of food myths around.

Lies about food and medicine, and associated conspiracy theories, are hurting people. The worst offenders are the ones with the biggest platforms โ€” Tom Brady, Gwyneth Paltrow,ย New York Times, Stonyfieldย โ€” Iโ€™m looking at you.

Read full, original post:ย Flu and fish-mato

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-11_49_36-AM-2
โ€˜You donโ€™t understand Tolkienโ€™: Skeptic Pope trolls tech giants about the exaggerated, risk-less benefits of AI
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-01_27_58-PM
Viewpointโ€”N.A.D.+: Why Gwenyth Paltrowโ€™s heralded anti-aging supplement doesnโ€™t work
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
Screenshot-2026-06-04-at-12.05.08-PM
Cases of brain inflammation surge as U.S. measles pandemic approaches 2000
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
downsyndrome_compilation_MID_1
CRISPR breakthrough that can remove the chromosome responsible for Down syndrome raises ethical questions
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile โ€˜thought experimentโ€™
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_21_36 AM
Limiting gender affirming interventions: Trump administration targets Texas even though it already bans youth access

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.