After 25 years, will Congress revive NASA’s Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI)?

radio tele shutterstock WEBONLY x x
SETI radio telescopes. Image credit: Sdecoret/Shutterstock

Lawmakers in the House of Representatives recentlyย proposed legislationย forย NASAโ€™s future that includes some intriguing language. The space agency, the bill recommends, should spend $10 million on the โ€œsearch for technosignatures, such as radio transmissionsโ€ per year, for the next two fiscal years.

The House billโ€”should it survive a vote in the House and passage in the Senateโ€”can only make recommendations for how agencies should use federal funding. But forย [Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, or] SETIย researchers like [Jill] Tarter, the fact that it even exists is thrilling. Itโ€™s the first time congressional lawmakers have proposed using federal cash to fundย SETI in 25 years.

โ€ฆ

[T]echnosignatures refer to a wide assortment of potential markers of advanced beings that could conceivably be spotted by telescopes, on the ground or in space. Perhaps other technologically advanced civilizations use laser transmissions to communicate. Maybe they have forgedย blast shieldsย to protect themselves from invaders, or built enormous spheres to harness their starโ€™s light and power their operations. Maybe, like us, theyโ€™ve lit their surfaces with shimmering city lights or padded their atmosphere with pollutants.

โ€ฆ

Today, after 25 years of discoveries and breakthroughs and progress, the suggestion that we might somedayโ€”and perhaps someday soonโ€”stumble upon an alien civilization, even the remains of one, doesnโ€™t seem quite so silly anymore.

Read full, original post:ย Congress Is Quietly Nudging NASA to Look for Aliens

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin Dย 
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
Screenshot 2026-02-25 at 11.20
Why the herbicide glyphosate is key to sustainable agriculture
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
screen shot at pm
Word games: How Moderna is selling its newest vaccine without using the โ€œvโ€ word
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-28-2026-12_46_14-PM-2
Kennedy has quietly stopped touting problematic raw milk. Health concerns arenโ€™t why
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_57_31-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Science-as-Satanโ€™ unites the MAHAโ€”MAGA movements. Is a breakup in the works?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your healthย 
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.