California agency rejects Prop 65, sets aside ruling requiring that coffee carry a cancer warning

Deadly coffee concept TiSanti Getty Images large
Image Credit: TiSanti - Getty Images

On [June 15th], the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed a regulation that would exempt coffee from requiring a carcinogen warning under Proposition 65 despite its acrylamide content, the APย reports. The proposed regulation comes in the wake of a new review of more than 1,000 studies, published by the World Health Organization (WHO), that found inadequate evidence that coffee causes cancer, as reported by the AP.

โ€œThe proposed regulation would state that drinking coffee does not pose a significant cancer risk, despite the presence of chemicals created during the roasting and brewing process that are listed under Proposition 65 as known carcinogens,โ€ the agency said in a statement obtained by the AP. โ€œThe proposed regulation is based on extensive scientific evidence that drinking coffee has not been shown to increase the risk of cancer and may reduce the risk of some types of cancer.โ€

If this regulation is approved (the timeline is unclear at this stage), coffee companies involved in the ongoing court caseย Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) v. Starbucks Corp. et al.ย could avoid having to post Prop 65 warnings as well as possible financial penalties.

Read full, original article:ย How Worried Do You Need to Be About Those Cancer Warnings for Your Coffee?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of howย  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
โ€˜Science moves forward when people are willing to think differentlyโ€™: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health โ€” or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.