78 percent of Germans say humans have ‘no right’ to genetically engineer plants and animals, government study shows

ttip gmo demonstration berlin si
Image Credit: Reuters/Fabrizio Bensch

79 percent of Germans agree that genetic engineering should be banned in agriculture, according to a 2017 study by the Federal Ministry for the Environment.

Support for a ban on genetically modified organisms has been relatively stable at a high level for years, the study shows, which was conducted previously in 2009, 2013 and 2015. The answers of the 2000 consumers surveyed highlight two reasons for the desired ban on agricultural biotechnology: two-thirds of consumers do not want to eat genetically modified food. 78 percent of those surveyed said they believe “[h]umans have no right to genetically modify plants and animals.”

In her statement on the presentation of the study, Federal Environment Minister Svenja Schulze said she took citizens’ concerns about genetic engineering very seriously: “We finally need uniform regulations nationwide in order to ban the cultivation of genetically engineered plants.”

According to Bundestag member Harald Ebner, a long-time critic of biotechnology,

Genetic engineering, be it ‘old’ or new methods like CRISPR, should at least be regulated, thoroughly tested and clearly marked, so that you can decide for yourself. The federal government must make it clear that new genetic engineering is genetic engineering…

Editor’s note: This article and the study it reports were originally published in German. This English summary has been prepared with Google Translate and lightly edited for clarity.

Read full, original article: Unchanged: Four-fifths of Germans reject agro-engineering

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend