Why does CRISPR randomly fail 15% of the time?

crispr mutations copy
Image credit: Nature

The CRISPR gene editing process is known to fail about 15 percent of the time. These random failures have until now been a mystery to scientists who consistently work with the technique. When the technique is working properly, an enzyme called Cas9 is what actively makes the cuts to a desired position in a DNA strand. After the cut is made either a new desired sequence is added or an unwanted section is simply removed, with the two cut points gluing themselves back together.

The new research revealed that when the CRISPR process fails it is because the Cas9 enzyme effectively sticks to the DNA cut point, blocking the subsequent DNA repair process.

The study also found that when RNA polymerases collide with Cas9 they can force the enzyme to dislodge. This means that consistent strand selection can significantly improve the genome editing technique’s efficiency.

“I was shocked that simply choosing one DNA strand over the other had such a powerful effect on genome editing,” says Ryan Clarke, lead author of the study. “Uncovering the mechanism behind this phenomenon helps us better understand how Cas9 interactions with the genome can cause some editing attempts to fail and that, when designing a genome editing experiment, we can use that understanding to our benefit.”

Read full, original post: Researchers discover why the CRISPR gene editing system sometimes fails

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Misinformation alert: No, glyphosate use in Canadian forests is not spurring more wildfires
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-02_39_22-PM
Viewpoint: Polyphenols or NAD+ supplements to combat aging: No, Gwenyth Paltrow and followers, don’t waste your money.
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-8-2026-12_32_48-PM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS strikes a blow against junk science in Bayer glyphosate case. Will it deter mass tort litigators?
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
afb-a-b
As the EU loosens restrictions on agricultural gene editing, it remains years behind the rest of the world on equally-safe GMO foods
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-01_57_55-PM
Viewpoint: Europe’s rejection of air conditioning is the poster child for misunderstanding how to mitigate the impact of climate change
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-17-2026-12_42_10-PM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr. is setting up a panel to compensate people who claim they were injured by a COVID vaccine–no proof needed 
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-03_29_08-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the impact of the U.S. abandoning support for global health?
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-03_33_49-PM
‘Alternative’ cancer treatments that could kill you
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.