Why does CRISPR randomly fail 15% of the time?

crispr mutations copy
Image credit: Nature

The CRISPR gene editing process is known to fail about 15 percent of the time. These random failures have until now been a mystery to scientists who consistently work with the technique. When the technique is working properly, an enzyme called Cas9 is what actively makes the cuts to a desired position in a DNA strand. After the cut is made either a new desired sequence is added or an unwanted section is simply removed, with the two cut points gluing themselves back together.

The new research revealed that when the CRISPR process fails it is because the Cas9 enzyme effectively sticks to the DNA cut point, blocking the subsequent DNA repair process.

The study also found that when RNA polymerases collide with Cas9 they can force the enzyme to dislodge. This means that consistent strand selection can significantly improve the genome editing technique’s efficiency.

“I was shocked that simply choosing one DNA strand over the other had such a powerful effect on genome editing,” says Ryan Clarke, lead author of the study. “Uncovering the mechanism behind this phenomenon helps us better understand how Cas9 interactions with the genome can cause some editing attempts to fail and that, when designing a genome editing experiment, we can use that understanding to our benefit.”

Read full, original post: Researchers discover why the CRISPR gene editing system sometimes fails

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of how  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.