FDA approves 23andMe’s direct-to-consumer DNA test assessing patient’s ability to respond to antidepressants

pharmacogenetics

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced [October 31] that it has approved the marketing of 23andMe’s reports on pharmacogenetics, which the genetic-testing company claims are designed to assess whether genetics may affect an individual’s ability to metabolize certain drugs including antidepressants.

The company is characterizing the move as the “first authorization of a direct-to-consumer report on pharmacogenetics.” But with the approval of 23andMe’s Personal Genome Service test also come a number of caveats, the most glaring of which being that the test is meant to facilitate conversations with healthcare professionals rather than inform any kind of final word on medications or treatments.

The FDA says the tests aren’t meant to be used to inform the recommendations for treatment by a provider, assess a patient’s ability to respond to medications, or even be interpreted without additional “independent pharmacogenetic testing.”

Related article:  Genetic mutation blamed for mysterious heart condition killing young members of Amish community

“Even if you test negative for all known [disease] genes, your risk for that disease may still be increased based on your family history,” Mary Freivogel, president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, told Stat [in 2017]. “A negative 23andMe test might provide false assurance.”

As appears to be the indication from the FDA, it may be best to take any genetic-testing kit with a grain of salt.

Read full, original post: FDA Approves New 23andMe Pharmacogenetic Reports, But There Are Some Caveats

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend