Should Europe’s 17-year-old GMO regulations apply to CRISPR-edited crops?

plant

Dutch Agriculture Minister Carola Schouten said recently that CRISPR gene editing is indispensable for making agriculture more sustainable. Using this new technology, scientists can modify the DNA of all kinds of organisms relatively easily.

In October last year, [the government said] “the Netherlands will commit itself in Europe to the application and admission of new breeding techniques” including CRISPR …. But this summer …. the European Court of Justice ruled on 25 July that [crop] varieties made with CRISPR technology fall under the European regulations for genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

The [government argued that the EU should] make an exception CRISPR-based techniques in European GMO legislation …. The Dutch government said that the CRISPR-Cas techniques are comparable to traditional plant breeding, but are much more precise. This means that breeders have more control over the end result and the process is therefore inherently safer than classical mutagenesis.

The question is whether the [2001 GMO] legislation still suffices with the arrival of new technologies with far greater possibilities and a different level of risk. A revision of the European GMO legislation is urgently needed …. It is not the technique that should determine whether or not there is a license obligation for genetically modified crops, but the properties of the end product ….

[Editor’s note: This article was originally published in Dutch. This summary was prepared with Google Translate and edited for clarity.]

Read full, original article: Get the crisis in the greenhouse

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-11.32.12-AM
Viewpoint: Trump appoints climate change hoax promoter to head influential government policy project
Screenshot 2026-07-16 at 8.49
Pete Hegseth’s bizarre Viagra commercial as Trump administration endorses ‘hormone replacement therapy’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-6.02.54-PM
Wellness grifters overwhelm information channels in the developing world, and the problem is escalating
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Misinformation alert: No, glyphosate use in Canadian forests is not spurring more wildfires
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-02_39_22-PM
Viewpoint: Polyphenols or NAD+ supplements to combat aging: No, Gwenyth Paltrow and followers, don’t waste your money.
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-03_33_49-PM
‘Alternative’ cancer treatments that could kill you
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-12.08.38-PM
Viewpoint: With trust in doctors and mainstream medicine collapsing, medical professionals need a new communications strategy
Screenshot-2026-07-08-at-9.36.03-AM
Viewpoint: Long-contained diseases are on the rise in the U.S. Are Trump cuts to blame?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.