Unhealthy sperm often overlooked as cause of lost pregnancies

1-14-2019 sperm feature human sperm
Image credit: Charles H. Muller/University of Washington.

Doctors often recommend women who experience recurrent pregnancy loss, usually defined as three or more losses, undergo testing to try and identify any reason for them. But their male partners, despite the critical importance of sperm in successful pregnancies, usually aren’t similarly screened.

According to a new study, though, the sperm of men whose partners’ experience pregnancy losses have increased DNA damage—which is linked to bad outcomes in pregnancy. In addition, men in partnerships experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss have altered hormone levels.

Sperm with fragmented DNA might be able to fertilize an egg and initiate a pregnancy, because they still have the right number of chromosomes to being the process, [chief of reproductive endocrinology and infertility at Columbia, Zed] Williams says. The paternal DNA, though, isn’t called into action until later in the process. “Once the male genome is activated, that’s when you start seeing problems,” he says. “Women can get pregnant, and then have pregnancy loss shortly after.”

Our understanding of sperm and pregnancy has changed—it used to be thought that, if a pregnancy could occur, the sperm was healthy. “It was sort of thought if a woman gets pregnant, they could check off the male side as causing problems—but we’re not sure that’s the case,” Williams says.

Read full, original post: Unhealthy sperm can play a role in lost pregnancies

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-21-2026-02_33_08-PM
Texas Air Force base flu outbreak soars to over 220 cases, and one soldier has died after Secretary Hegseth scrapped mandatory military flu shots 
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-11_51_00-AM-4
Viewpoint: As the International Association for Research on Cancer loses influence, activists and trial lawyers scramble to protect a lucrative playbook
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
screenshot pm
Which is better for building healthy farm soil? Organic offers no special edge.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-13-2026-11_51_39-AM
Viewpoint: COVID lab leak? Misguided backers of the lab leak theory refuse to give up
wuhan institute of virology main entrance
​​COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-05_21_35-PM
The American Medical Association doctors declare war on RFK, Jr.’s attack on safe vaccines
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-19-at-4.53.19-PM
Viewpoint: How the Trump administration is thwarting the will of Congress and starving American science
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpoint—Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.