Forest biotech scientists lobby against GMO tree ban to promote sustainable forestry

sun shining through tall trees in forest
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

A group of leading forest biotechnology scientists from around the world call for the reassessment of all sustainable forestry certification systems and suggest that current policies should be modified to promote forest resilience and sustainability. The authors of the recent editorial published on 23 August in Science argue that the existing ban on genetically modified (GM) trees hinders research efforts. Therefore, the researchers have garnered support from more than 1000 signatories of a petition.

Related article:  Viewpoint: German regulators shouldn't trust Testbiotech and other anti-biotech 'lobbyists' to guide public about CRISPR gene editing

Genetically engineered or gene-edited trees are consistently excluded from certified lands, including those for field research. But are essential for understanding local benefits and impacts, the authors write. Furthermore, the ban only adds more fuel to widespread skepticism of GM products, creating a perception that technologies like gene editing are “bad”. When instead, they could be used as one more tool against the ever-increasing struggle against climate change. And could help farmers and planters grown trees in a more economical and sustainable way.

Read full, original article: Sustainable forestry organisations should lift ban on GM trees, scientists say

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend