Viewpoint: New EU Parliament should stop ‘shunning science’ and embrace GMOs

European Parliament Strasbourg Hemicycle Diliff

The recently elected European Parliament (EP) should bring with it a ray of hope. Hope that Europe will rise to the occasion, to tackle global challenges like climate change and food insecurity. And GMOs – and biotechnology more generally – can and should be part of the solution. Unfortunately, following a change of more than 60% of MEPs in the Parliament, EP objections to GMOs, which began several years ago, have continued, with some MEPs blaming GMOs for many of the global challenges we face today.

The evidence shows that growing GMOs has led to a reduction in agricultural chemical use of 37% overall, and much more when it comes to insect resistant GM crops. And their use has greatly increased farm and environmental safety, for example by significantly reducing suicide rates and pesticide poisoning on smallholder farms in the developing world.

Related article:  Viewpoint: Anti-biotech groups' master plan substitutes 'citizen science' for data in quest to get glyphosate banned

Furthermore, the increased yields per hectare associated with GMOs spares pressure on surrounding lands, including rainforests …. [I]t makes sense to grow crops efficiently to help avoid additional land conversion.

Already today, the reality in Europe is that most people wear GM cotton, and eat a variety of food products that were produced with the help of biotechnology, including GMOs.

Read full, original article: Senselessly shunning science: the EU Parliament’s GMO dilemma

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Nigeriacotton

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
breastfeeding bed x facebook x

Infographic: We know breastfeeding helps children. Now we know it helps mothers too

When a woman becomes pregnant, her risk of type 2 diabetes increases for the rest of her life, perhaps because ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend