‘Dogs are still the best’: But can a machine be taught to detect ovarian cancer with a ‘sniff’?

unnamed
Credit: In Situ Foundation

The ultimate goal was to develop an instrument that mimicked the abilities of a dog’s nose—a tool to detect the undetectable.

And that’s exactly what a group of scientists in Philadelphia is trying to do—a group that [ophthalmologist Jody] Piltz-Seymour had a hand in assembling. Creating such a device—one that could save the thousands of patients who die from ovarian cancer every year—requires a specialized team: an oncologist, a chemist, an experimental nanophysicist, a veterinarian, and a band of highly-trained dogs.

“If we could come up with an instrument that was as good as a dog, or even approached a dog, I think in the long run that would be a better solution,” [researcher Charlie] Johnson says. And that’s exactly what he’s done.

Depending on the type or amount of [volatile organic compounds] present in the vapor sample, the pattern of electrical charges will be different—telling Johnson’s team if a sample is ovarian cancer-positive or not. At this stage, the prototype is still not up to snuff. “The dogs are still the best,” Johnson admits, but adds, “We have a system that can detect correctly somewhere between 90% and 95% of the time.” 

Read the original post

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.