Breastfed babies at lower risk of contracting antibiotic-resistant ‘superbugs’

Credit: UNICEF
Credit: UNICEF

Breastfeeding has been associated with many health benefits for mothers and their babies, including stronger immune systems for the children. 

Now, a new study offers another reason to choose breastfeeding over formula: breastfed newborns may be at less risk for so-called “superbugs.” 

University of Helsinki researchers found breastfeeding is linked to a reduction in bacteria resistant to antibiotics in babies’ gut microbiome. They found formula is associated with almost 70% more occurrence of genes associated with antibiotic resistance. 

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest health challenges in the U.S., according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Each year, approximately 2.8 million people develop an antibiotic-resistant infection and more than 35,000 people die.

“Breastmilk is the primary source of nutrition for all infants, and its health benefits are of particular importance to premature infants,” lead study author Dr. Katariina Pärnänen said.

“The new findings indicate that breastfeeding premature and newborn infants also reduces the proliferation of bacteria resistant to antibiotics in the infant gut, thus potentially reducing the risk of difficult infections, which I consider a particularly important find due to the ever-increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-9.03.54-AM
From Malaysia to the world: A pioneering science communicator reimagines global science communication for a digital age
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-20-at-4.31.28-PM
White House drafting executive order to control what OMB Director Vought claims are “woke” NIH science grants
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-20-2026-04_22_32-PM
What’s Trump’s ‘AI Force’? Administration rushes to announce ill-defined watchdog agency and czar amid criticism of its resistance to curb AI acceleration
Screenshot-2026-08-12-at-11.31.46-AM
AI is helping develop new vaccines
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-4.31.14-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the likely impact when the EPA loosens rules limiting methane pollution from oil and gas wells?
Screenshot-2026-08-19-at-6.19.42-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: 'Regenerative farming'? RFK Jr.’s federal push romanticizes the past and risks food security
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-18-2026-10_49_24-AM
‘Symptom borrowing’: Young people are copying health problems they see on TikTok
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-9-2026-02_48_24-PM
Viewpoint: Trump-RFK Jr. report on “Gender Ideology & Left-wing Ideology’ targets LGBTQ community—and science
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.