California court upholds $86.2 million settlement against Bayer for alleged damages caused by Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller

Credit: About Lawsuits
Credit: About Lawsuits

The state Supreme Court rejected a challenge by Monsanto Co. on [November 17] to $86.2 million in damages to a Livermore couple diagnosed with cancer after spraying the company’s Roundup weed killer on their crops for 30 years.

The jury verdict for Alva and Alberta Pilliod was the third and largest in three Bay Area trials of suits by cancer patients against the manufacturer of the world’s most widely used herbicide. German pharmaceutical company Bayer AG, which acquired Monsanto for $63 billion in 2018, has agreed to pay $10 billion to settle thousands of pending lawsuits across the United States.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Bayer has also announced that, starting in 2023, it would find a substitute for Roundup’s main ingredient, glyphosate, in sales for home and garden use in the United States, while continuing to sell the current product for agricultural use. The company insists glyphosate poses no danger and cites decisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and regulators in several other nations, approving the sale of Roundup.

However, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, an arm of the World Health Organization, found in 2015 that glyphosate was a probable cause of cancer in humans.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
Screenshot 2026-02-25 at 11.20
Why the herbicide glyphosate is key to sustainable agriculture
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your health 
screen shot at pm
Word games: How Moderna is selling its newest vaccine without using the “v” word
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-28-2026-12_46_14-PM-2
Kennedy has quietly stopped touting problematic raw milk. Health concerns aren’t why
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.