The ‘Holy Breath’ eating plan is one of dozens of fad diets. Here’s why none of them really work

Credit: Alamy
Credit: Alamy

Extreme low-cal, Atkins, dukan, south beach, fasting, the hacker’s diet, paleo, keto… the list goes on and on. My personal favorite, the Inedia Diet, proposes that one can live entirely without food, sustained only on the Holy Breath.

Fad diets are a victory for modern consumerism, but the data show they don’t work. After the initial weight loss owing to severe caloric restriction, studies indicate that up to two-thirds of the lost weight is regained within one year, and almost all of it is regained within five years. In many cases, weight increases beyond baseline. This is because diets rarely teach people how to eat healthily in a sustainable way.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Not only do fad diets (like the ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting) fail to promote any aspect of heart health, but the yo-yo dieting that often results may actually increase the risk of heart disease, particularly in woman, and increase the risk of all-cause mortality. The literature also shows a consistent link between fluctuating weight and psychopathology, life dissatisfaction, and binge eating.

There is no quick fix, no “one weird trick to busting belly fat,” no fad diet or detox that’ll yield long-term results. That’s all based on very bad science.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.