‘Category X’: What’s the science behind asexuality?

Credit: David Allan Barker
Credit: David Allan Barker

“Asexuality is an identity on equal footing with heterosexuality, homosexuality and so on”, says Sunniva Árja Tobiasen.

She is one of the few academics in Norway who has immersed herself in research on asexuality, during her master’s programme at the University of Oslo. Unlike other sexual identities, people don’t talk much about being asexual in our society.

For some individuals, it can therefore be difficult to reconcile themselves to the fact that they do not feel a sexual attraction to other people.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The first time asexuality was described in a way similar to how we think of it today was in 1954. In the Kinsey report on women’s sexual habits and behaviour, the authors introduced category X:

Finally, an individual receives the designation X if he or she does not react erotically to either heterosexual or homosexual stimuli.

…

Both Tobiasen and [professor Randi Elin] Gressgård believe that the medical community has contributed to pathologizing asexuality.

The definition of diagnoses labelled sexual dysfunctions overlaps with the description of being asexual.

“Experiencing little or no sexual desire does not have to mean that something is wrong,” says Tobiasen.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jul 31, 2026, 08_05_37 AM
26% and far worse than during COVID: Under RFK Jr., Americans’ opinion of ‘revamped’ CDC hits an all-time low
Cancer mRNA Vaccine Concept
'A new frontier': Though scorned by RFK Jr., personalized mRNA vaccine offers hope for many suffering from melanoma skin cancer
Screenshot-2026-10-26-at-11.06.10-AM
Viewpoint: The organic, good-food, small-farm movement is seductive but wrongheaded. Here’s the sustainability and environmental case for industrial farming
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Screenshot-2026-10-24-121036
Many hospitals embrace longevity medicine. Are they separating science from hype?
China Innovation Lightbulb 2
China’s 5-year plan to accelerate science innovation is putting the U.S. and Europe in the rearview mirror
Screenshot-2026-10-23-at-10.37.12-AM
Viewpoint: Drones, dollars and baby food: Critical innovations that anti-plastic ideologues willfully ignore
Crimson Drips Over the White House
In Trump administration redirect, U.S. steers NIH sharply away from biodefense and pandemic preparedness
Healthy Food Sensitivity Test Collection
Viewpoint: That’ll be $300: The wellness industry’s junk science scam to ‘fix’ your immune system that isn’t broken
West-Virginia-SNAP-Water-Bottle-Sticker
A ‘shining success’ or 'empty promises’: Two years along, West Virginians assess MAHA’s food promises
Rustic Skillet of Raw Brains
‘Weird food’? Testicle- and brain-eating, supplement-gulping MAHA health food enthusiasts defend their ‘natural’ diets
Screenshot-2026-10-19-at-12.04.51-PM
Victims of their own success: As memories of killer diseases fade, vaccine rejectionism soars
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.