‘Category X’: What’s the science behind asexuality?

Credit: David Allan Barker
Credit: David Allan Barker

“Asexuality is an identity on equal footing with heterosexuality, homosexuality and so on”, says Sunniva Árja Tobiasen.

She is one of the few academics in Norway who has immersed herself in research on asexuality, during her master’s programme at the University of Oslo. Unlike other sexual identities, people don’t talk much about being asexual in our society.

For some individuals, it can therefore be difficult to reconcile themselves to the fact that they do not feel a sexual attraction to other people.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The first time asexuality was described in a way similar to how we think of it today was in 1954. In the Kinsey report on women’s sexual habits and behaviour, the authors introduced category X:

Finally, an individual receives the designation X if he or she does not react erotically to either heterosexual or homosexual stimuli.

Both Tobiasen and [professor Randi Elin] Gressgård believe that the medical community has contributed to pathologizing asexuality.

The definition of diagnoses labelled sexual dysfunctions overlaps with the description of being asexual.

“Experiencing little or no sexual desire does not have to mean that something is wrong,” says Tobiasen.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
png livestock cow cattle a
Consumer skepticism about gene-edited milk is neither fixed nor particularly high—and falls even more if it’s priced lower
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-31-2026-07_35_35-AM
Wikipedia has assembled an informative list of fake news websites from across the ideological spectrum
Screenshot-2026-07-31-at-10.52.03-AM
Love sweets and fatty foods? You can blame your genes, but there are ways to quell the obsessions
Screenshot-2026-08-03-at-2.25.49-PM
As measles vaccination rates collapse, scientists push for treatments long considered unnecessary
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 09_08_15 AM 2
The retreat of environmental extremism: Why activist NGOs are losing favor
Screenshot-2026-08-03-at-2.15.16-PM
Viewpoint: Trump’s relaxed controls on supplying China with microchips could undermine U.S. AI dominance
Screenshot-2026-07-17-at-1.34.59-PM
Poll: Vaccine hesitancy soars when patients distrust health providers and turn to social media
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-4-2026-10_15_14-AM
Viewpoint—A hard look at the Fauci diaries: Do they change what we know about COVID’s origins?
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 10_17_59 AM
Viewpoint: What does it mean when critics of conventional agriculture say many fruits and vegetables are “linked” to pesticide poisoning?
Screenshot-2026-08-03-at-2.06.39-PM
Viewpoint: Green energy supporters ‘fight back’ against conservative foundations backing  fossil fuel industry
ChatGPT Image Jul 31, 2026, 08_05_37 AM
With trust in RFK, Jr.'s CDC vaccine advice collapsing, physicians scramble to fill the information gap
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.