Can CRISPR gene edited seeds be grown organically? Organic farmers and advocates are split

Fungal blights may be harmful to human health. As such, a safer, blight resistant wheat may win the hearts of organic farmers. Credit: American Phytopathological Society
Fungal blights may be harmful to human health. As such, a safer, blight resistant wheat may win the hearts of organic farmers. Credit: American Phytopathological Society

The International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM) said, in a paper, that “new genetic engineering technologies… are not compatible with organic farming and must not be used in organic breeding or organic production.”

That seems like a clear “no” around gene editing.

But the debate over gene-edited crops is not over in organics. Some farmers and industry leaders support gene editing.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“It is a very polarizing topic,” said Susanna Klassen, who is working on her PhD in sustainable food systems at the University of British Columbia.

“People tend to be on one side or other of this debate.”

Gene editing, or genome editing, is technology where scientists can delete or change specific genes in a plant to achieve desired traits. It’s different from the old transgenic technology, used to develop genetically modified crops.

Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corp. data from 2019-20 shows the average yield from organic crops is about 40 to 50 percent of conventional crops.

If gene editing produced a wheat variety with better resistance to fusarium head blight, for example, organic growers could boost yields.

“You might get a slightly different answer (from farmers),” [researcher Sara] Nawaz said.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here. 

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-10_30_14-PM
Zero: That is the official American measles death toll for 2026. Here is what RFK Jr.’s CDC leaves out.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_24_17-AM
Bayer urges court to approve $7.25 billion Monsanto Roundup settlement that could limit its future liabilities
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-11_36_25-AM
How the reckless AI race among Anthropic, OpenAI and China spawned today’s safety crisis
screenshot at  am
‘Glyphosate is not carcinogenic’: Independent EU chemical oversight agency reaffirms—for the 3rd time in 9 years—that the herbicide is safe-as-used
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-3.07.56-PM
Trump EPA rolls back power-plant climate rules—and moves to block future carbon limits
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-10.52.30-AM
AI is being used in dangerous bioscience experiments
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_46_11-AM
“Hit the brakes”: Anthropic warns the race to superintelligence could spawn internet-seizing AI swarms—and empower authoritarians. Here’s how to stop it.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-02_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: 6 Atlantic Council expert opinions on the U.S., China and the AI safety crisis
Screenshot-2026-08-04-at-11.36.16-AM
Viewpoint: Emotion-driven stories of doctors allegedly ignoring patient concerns are driving vaccine hesitancy
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-14-2026-11_16_47-AM
Fibermaxxing: Latest Instagram diet craze raises hope that a fiber-rich diet can improve health
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.