Viewpoint: Why consumers will ignore new ‘bioengineered’ labels

Credit: Alamy
Credit: Alamy

The USDA’s mandatory labeling for bioengineered crops (f/k/a GMO) went into effect January 1st. But will it actually change consumer preferences and shopping habits? According to a study from Cornell University, probably not.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Companies have the option of simply adding a QR code on their packaging. Shoppers have to actively take the step of scanning the QR code and reading the information to learn whether the product contains any bioengineered products. So without a visual cue (even the sunny and warm BE labels) the vast majority of consumers will never even realize it’s there.

There was another unsurprising aspect to this as well. When there was a debate about GMO labeling in any particular jurisdiction, Google searches about GMOs increased. But as soon as that debate was over, the interest waned as well.

And that explains why some groups aren’t happy about the BE label: it isn’t going to scare people. They were hoping for a skull-and-cross-bones label. They spent years demonizing biotechnology and they’re angry the government doesn’t want to use the-long-maligned term GMO. Just remember: if people are scared, they aren’t donating money to activist organizations!!

That’s precisely why I’m such a fan!

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
Screenshot 2026-02-25 at 11.20
Why the herbicide glyphosate is key to sustainable agriculture
Screenshot-2026-04-27-at-12.22.38-PM
Running ‘wild’: Last year, RFK, Jr. was given a green light to ‘reform’ chemical policies. Glyphosate illustrates how Trump now has him on a tight leash, and MAHA is furious
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.