Viewpoint: GMO technology is ‘no threat’ to indigenous Ethiopian crops. Here’s why

Credit: USAID
Credit: USAID

“Should we be worried about losing our indigenous crops because of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)?” The answer is an outright No.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

There have been arguments that the introduction of genetically modified crops would result in loss of indigenous resources as farmers, consumers and everyone in the agricultural value chain are believed to abandon their indigenous varieties in favor of GM crops.

The reality is that no indigenous varieties of any crop will be lost when GM crops are introduced for the latter and other non-GM crops can co-exist. GM crops bring only one or a few traits of interest while all the other farmer favored traits are preserved in the new variety. Our scientist in the national gene bank also regularly conserves crop germplasm since conventional crop breeding itself reduces germplasm diversity GM crops have been grown for more than 33 years across the world and there has never been any incidents recorded of them replacing indigenous varieties.

It is not possible to say no indigenous crop would be existent today since all would have been replaced by conventionally bred crop varieties because farmers have continued selecting and improving their indigenous varieties every year for centuries. Besides, GM crops are not necessarily new varieties; rather they are existing varieties improved with selected traits such as pest resistance, herbicide resistance or drought tolerance.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-01_14_50-PM
Viewpoint: Disinformation grift: The wellness industry is a lucrative and mostly worthless marketplace of ‘balms, brews, and baloney’
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-01_09_47-PM
Viewpoint: As MAHA blows up over Supreme Court ruling limiting glyphosate litigation, Trump offers toothless plan to reduce pesticides in food
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-12_19_35-PM
Ideological red flag: Led by anti-vax doctor, Tennessee is now the U.S. epicenter selling potent ivermectin shown worthless to prevent or treat Covid
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-12_06_18-PM-2
Defying death: The immortality movement goes mainstream

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.