Viewpoint: GMO technology is ‘no threat’ to indigenous Ethiopian crops. Here’s why

Credit: USAID
Credit: USAID

“Should we be worried about losing our indigenous crops because of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)?” The answer is an outright No.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

There have been arguments that the introduction of genetically modified crops would result in loss of indigenous resources as farmers, consumers and everyone in the agricultural value chain are believed to abandon their indigenous varieties in favor of GM crops.

The reality is that no indigenous varieties of any crop will be lost when GM crops are introduced for the latter and other non-GM crops can co-exist. GM crops bring only one or a few traits of interest while all the other farmer favored traits are preserved in the new variety. Our scientist in the national gene bank also regularly conserves crop germplasm since conventional crop breeding itself reduces germplasm diversity GM crops have been grown for more than 33 years across the world and there has never been any incidents recorded of them replacing indigenous varieties.

It is not possible to say no indigenous crop would be existent today since all would have been replaced by conventionally bred crop varieties because farmers have continued selecting and improving their indigenous varieties every year for centuries. Besides, GM crops are not necessarily new varieties; rather they are existing varieties improved with selected traits such as pest resistance, herbicide resistance or drought tolerance.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standard—Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
downsyndrome_compilation_MID_1
CRISPR breakthrough that can remove the chromosome responsible for Down syndrome raises ethical questions
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-01_27_58-PM
Viewpoint—N.A.D.+: Why Gwenyth Paltrow’s heralded anti-aging supplement doesn’t work
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffee—including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isn’t it banned?
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile ‘thought experiment’

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.