Fact check: Associated Press debunks social media claims that GMO corn can cause cancer

Social media users in recent days have falsely claimed genetically modified corn isn’t safe because it’s been found to cause cancerous tumors and other health complications in rats.

Most posts point to a decade-old study by Gilles-Eric Séralini, a molecular biologist at the University of Caen in Normandy, France, that generated fierce debate within the scientific community when it was first released in 2012, only to be retracted and republished elsewhere.

“Remember, GM corn proven unsafe for human consumption in chronic toxicity study from 2012,” wrote one Instagram user.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The lengthy post, which has been liked a few hundred times, goes on to say that the test subjects, some of which were also given pesticides in their drinking water, died from “horrendous tumors in their cleansing organs” within months.

But the Séralini study was retracted by the academic journal Food and Chemical Toxicology the following year amid criticism from other scientists.

Subsequent studies by other scientists have also been unable to replicate Séralini’s data or conclusions, according to Richard Goodman, a food allergy researcher at the University of Nebraska who was an editor at Food and Chemical Toxicology when Séralini’s article was retracted by the journal.

In fact, a 2019 study published in the Archives of Toxicology using a different strain of rat found “no adverse effects” from feeding the animals genetically modified corn, Goodman noted.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-01_04_14-PM
Viewpoint: How politicized science became a political religion 
DtAieAIkCZy-uchn-oqg
Viewpoint: In the science misinformed grifter game plan, the organic-food-is-healthier myth might be the worst.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-03_00_23-PM
World’s first AI-designed vaccine explained
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-10.48.33-AM
700,000-person study reaffirms that getting a flu and Covid shot on the same day is safe
d a ca e c c beb x
Facts & Fallacies podcast: The 'woke' crusade against anthropology? Dr. Elizabeth Weiss
eu-farming-policy
EU bureaucrats are finally catching up to the gene editing revolution in food and agriculture
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-03_07_17-PM
Kennedy blocks preventive health care panel that reviews treatments for HIV, diabetes, and cancer from meeting — for fourth time
GMOprotest
Viewpoint: CRISPR-hating activists air their grievances about gene editing farming innovation
Screenshot-2026-07-06-at-11.30.08-AM
AI is making even its founders uneasy: ‘We find evidence of introspection, joy, satisfaction, fear, grief and unease.’
Picture1
Viewpoint: The Lackland flu outbreak is fading but Hegseth’s military anti-vaccine fiasco is not
chjpdmf zs sci pbwfnzxmvd vic l zs ymdiylta l zsmtu nty otkwmtetaw hz uta a dzjyy euanbn
Technical milestone or designer baby obsession: Latest gene-editing advance reignites a familiar ethical debate
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.