Viewpoint: ‘25 years of proof that GM foods are safe for the environment and humans’ – Nobel Prize winning geneticist makes case for embracing gene editing

Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard with zebrafish at the Max-Planck Institute. Credit: Nobel Prize Museum
Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard with zebrafish at the Max-Planck Institute. Credit: Nobel Prize Museum

Genetically modified plants are not cultivated in Europe, the regulatory requirements are too strict and the reservations of the population are too great. Nobel Prize winner Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard has long criticized this as anti-scientific and ideology-driven.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
[Nüsslein-Volhard:] For twenty-five years, genetically modified plants have been cultivated in huge fields in many countries, and no harm to people, nature or the environment has been proven to date. There was once a claim that genetically engineered corn outcrossed into wild species, but that was a fake.

Anything that people don’t like about modern agriculture is often blamed on genetic engineering. Even in Germany, although there is no genetic engineering in agriculture here.

Genome-edited plant varieties should be excluded from the scope of application of genetic engineering law. This would also allow for field trials, which are necessary to test a new variety. Otherwise they will be destroyed immediately by radical opponents. In the long term, the European genetic engineering law of 2001 should be thoroughly revised in order to take into account the positive experiences of “classic” genetic engineering that have since been collected.

[Editor’s note: This article has been translated from German and edited for clarity.]

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-02_53_56-PM
Embryo gene editing is on the horizon, stirring mixed emotions
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
a-mature-farmer-working-in-the-field-at-sunrise-harvesting-crops-generated-by-ai-photo
What’s the prospect of developing gene-altered crops that are more nutritious and resist climate disruption
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
png-upside-food-syn-bio-cultured-meat
Regulating cultured meat around the world
Screenshot-2026-07-21-at-6.22.06-PM
The Indian physician’s one-woman battle against health disinformation on Wikipedia
reverse-aging
Rapamycin: Here’s the skinny on the anti-aging pill that increases the lifespan—of mice by 10%
YearReview Grift
Viewpoint: A practical guide to evaluating social media wellness hype
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-03_29_08-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the impact of the U.S. abandoning support for global health?
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-17-2026-12_42_10-PM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr. is setting up a panel to compensate people who claim they were injured by a COVID vaccine–no proof needed 
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.