Forensic genealogy: How new advances in DNA analysis can help solve decades-old cold cases

Credit: BodeFGS
Credit: BodeFGS

Scientists say using math to sort through DNA could help investigators put stubborn cold cases to rest. The approach combines the relatively new field of forensic genetic genealogy—solving crime by charting out DNA-based family trees—with increasing computational power to speed up and simplify this complex form of investigation.

In a new paper recently published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences, researchers from Stanford University, California-based Identifinders, and the DNA Doe Project explain how they developed a new mathematical model to help investigators greatly narrow down their giant pools of genetic candidates:

“We formulate a program that—given the list of matches and their genetic distances to the unknown target—chooses the best decision at each point in time: which match to investigate, which set of potential most recent common ancestors to descend from, or whether to terminate the investigation.”

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

By using a decision tree to optimize the candidate search, the researchers say their new process improves the existing process for forensic genetic genealogy by a factor of ten. They can also use this protocol to pull relevant matches even from large pools with a low likelihood of success. In fact, the new algorithm is so effective that researchers say it “can solve a case with a 7,500-person family tree around 94 percent of the time,” compared to only 4 percent of the time with the current method, according to a Stanford University press release.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Woman_Vaping_Electronic_Cigarette_50687233623
Trump administration clears the way for speedy approvals of once-restricted tobacco vapes and pouches
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_36_56-AM
Now AI almost started a war with China
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-10.27.33-AM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS poised to address First Amendment tension between mandatory vaccines, children’s health and religious freedom 
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-27-2026-10_00_17-AM
Current and future RFK Jr. aides criticize his science-rejectionist vaccine views
Screenshot-2026-09-24-at-1.24.47-PM
80% of Americans take (mostly useless) supplements for their health
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-11_54_00-AM
Viewpoint: Activist environmental NGOs are turning from public funding to activist billionaires to support their campaigns. It won’t end well.
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-2.26.42-PM
Viewpoint: How to ecologically damage America’s forests: Ban glyphosate
Screenshot-2026-08-19-at-6.19.42-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: 'Regenerative farming'? RFK Jr.’s federal push romanticizes the past and risks food security
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.