One in 300 people is an identical twin. What can they teach us about human nature and genetics?

Twins and the debate about biology and the environment
Credit: Asthma.net

About one in every 65 pregnancies in the UK results in a multiple birth, a figure that has grown since the advent of fertility treatments, and nearly all of those multiples will be twins. The unusualness of twins has captured the creative imagination going all the way back to the earliest of myths.

Worldwide, less than one in 300 people are identical twins. Effectively clones, they present not just a strikingly similar image of themselves, but also provide a mirror for society to examine the age-old questions of nature and nurture. But their likeness has often been treated not as a biological quirk but as something weird, even supernatural.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

[I]t’s that nature-nurture question again, which remains the subject of ongoing intellectual and political dispute. Central to any inquiry into what most determines our lives – biology or the environment – is the study of twins, specifically the comparison of identical and non-identical (also known as fraternal or dizygotic) twins.

That is to say that given that both types of twins are likely to be brought up in the same environment in very similar ways, if identical twins show a more pronounced sharing of traits, this is almost certainly due to genetic factors – particularly when studies involve a large number of twins. … “Results indicate that genetic influences account for over 60% of the variance in scientific achievement, with environmental influences accounting for the remaining variance.”

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The Orange Bowl without oranges: Can CRISPR save Florida citrus?
Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
‘Turbo cancer’ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Gutting the National Science Board: How the Trump-RFK, Jr. crusade is erasing the separation of science and state
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Screenshot 2025-11-12 at 3.28
GLP podcast: Evolutionary biologist debunks the 'sex spectrum'
Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 3.28
Vagus nerve wellness grift: How to build a billion dollar business. Are you listening, Kelly Ripa?
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-09_19_32-AM
Viewpoint— “A safe space to chat, flirt, and be intimate without sex”: Are new AI companies exploiting vulnerable asexuals?
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-09_04_31-AM-2
Hantavirus revives COVID-era conspiracies and distrust in public health 
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.