Viewpoint: In a world of dysfunctional food systems, is it realistic to hope for CRISPR gene editing to save agriculture?

ee d b fc b
Credit: CIAT/NeilPalmer (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Considering that farmers already lose 20-40 percent of their crop yields to pests, which costs them $200 million per year, they can’t afford to surpass this amount.

Especially not when 920 million people already live with food insecurity at a severe level – around 11 percent of the human population.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

CRISPR-strengthened foods could become a major lifeline for humanity (and all its farmers), as climate scientists have warned that crop-destroying fungi, bacteria, and insects will become far more difficult to avoid in a hotter world.

Combine these issues with a growing number of climate refugees, never-ending urbanisation, the loss of arable land, and overuse of pesticides and fertilisers – we’ve got a clusterfuck of issues to deal with.

Luckily, we’ve already got a bit of a leg up.

Those working in agriculture have identified various positive traits in certain crops, thanks to selective breeding. This has enabled farmers to fend off larger losses by favouring plants that produce bacterial proteins capable of killing or repelling pests.

Because many viruses need plant proteins to grow, multiply, and spread, it is possible that researchers can utilise CRISPR to eliminate or alter plant proteins a particular virus likes to take advantage of.

This would allow the plant to resist being hijacked by a foreign organism.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.