The threat of biological conflict is rising. Are we prepared?

Be prepared: first responders during an emergency exercise, Saint-Étienne, France, April 2016 Credit: Robert Pratta/Reuters
Be prepared: first responders during an emergency exercise, Saint-Étienne, France, April 2016 Credit: Robert Pratta/Reuters

The coronavirus, [Roger Brent (professor of basic sciences), T. Greg McKelvey Jr. (adviser to the Rand think tank) and Jason Matheny (Rand’s chief executive)] writes, was “an unthinking adversary” that probed the world’s defenses against new pathogens. Considering the toll the pandemic took in lives and social disorganization, imagine the “remarkably deadly” pathogens that thinking adversaries might design using rapidly advancing knowledge of molecular and human biology: “In a worst-case scenario, the worldwide death toll might exceed that of the Black Death” in the 14th century that killed 1 in 3 Europeans.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Brent, McKelvey and Matheny warn that for would-be terrorists, biological engineering, vastly accelerated by artificial intelligence, “could ease the path to mayhem”

Brent, McKelvey and Matheny urge “hardening” societies: developing “warning systems” to detect engineered diseases. (The coronavirus might have been one.) And preparing to surge production of personal protective equipment, vaccines and antiviral drugs. The world must “develop the ability to vaccinate its eight billion people within 100 days of an outbreak — faster than it took the United States to fully vaccinate 100 million people against Covid-19.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.