Should women who use hormonal IUDs be concerned about developing cancer?

Credit: Sexual Health & Family Planning ACT
Credit: Sexual Health & Family Planning ACT

A new Danish study shows that women who use hormonal IUDs may have a higher risk of developing breast cancer, [the] Norwegian newspaper VGย recently reported. Lina Mรธrch, one of the Danish researchers behind the new study, believes women over 38 should consider other contraceptives. But what do Norwegian researchers think about this conclusion? And what do other studies say about the link between hormonal IUDs and cancer?

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“Headlines like these create unnecessary fear,” [Marianne Natvik a general practitioner who researches women’s health at the University of Oslo] wrote in a post about the VG article on Instagram (link in Norwegian).

The Danish researchers found that among women who used hormonal IUDs, there were 14 more per 10,000 who developed breast cancer compared to those who did not use hormonal contraception.

“Although this is important research that we should consider when choosing contraception for each individual woman, this is not a particularly high number,” Natvik points out.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
newborn infant baby mother
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: The truth about vitamin K shots
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-10.02.22-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Industrial foodโ€™ primerโ€”Challenging the dangerous delusions of the alternative food movement
ChatGPT Image Jun 16, 2026, 12_03_37 PM
Kennedy accused of trying to โ€˜bullyโ€™ science journal that retracted study linking vaccines to infant deaths
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-3-2026-04_29_13-PM
Viewpoint: While unvaccinated children are dying overseas, Congress challenges Trump and Kennedyโ€™s block on aid
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-11_00_13-AM-2
Glucosamine alert: Alzheimerโ€™s progresses faster among those taking the popular supplement
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-12_13_41-PM
Viewpoint: Behind the effort to re-purpose the tobacco attack strategy to fight ultra-processed foods
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-12.33.01-PM
Whoโ€™s responsible when AI lies? Google challenging court ruling that search results are not protected from legal liability
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-11.23.32-AM
In a rebuke to RFK, Jr.โ€™s anti-vax crusade, journal retracts study claiming hepatitis B vaccineโ€“autism link
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-12.46.54-PM
Viewpoint: โ€œDead Wrongโ€โ€”Understanding healthcareโ€™s misinformation epidemic
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Screenshot-2026-06-14-at-9.53.54-AM
Is the World Cup a perfect storm for the spread of infectious diseases?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.