Viewpoint: Overhauling the teaching of genetics is necessary to eliminate the concept of race

Credit: Genetics Digest
Credit: Genetics Digest

On a lengthy busย ride in the early 1970s, University of Chicago geneticistย Richard Lewontinย passed the time by doing some novel math.

Using available data, he computed how protein differences [were] mapped across people around the globe. Contrary to what scientists assumed at the time, he found that most differences existed in every populationโ€”meaning the underlying genetic variation was shared across humanity, not sorted by geographic region or prevailing โ€œracialโ€ categories.

Lewontin published his calculationsย in a short paper in 1972 that ended with this definitive conclusion: โ€œSince โ€ฆ racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance either, no justification can be offered for its continuance.โ€

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

But despite huge strides in genetics researchโ€”leaving no doubt about the validity of Lewontinโ€™s conclusionsโ€”genetics curricula taughtย in U.S. secondary and post-secondary schools still largely reflect a pre-1970s view.

Increasingly, genomics plays a leading roleย in health care, criminal justice, and our sense of identity and connection to others. At the same time,ย scientific racismย is on the rise, reaching more people than everย thanks to social media. Outdated education fails to dispel this disinformation.

From the basic genetics taught in Kโ€“12 schools to university courses, biology curricula desperately need an overhaul.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
โ€˜Implausibleโ€™: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenarioโ€”soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limitedโ€“at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research showsโ€”but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
Screenshot-2026-05-20-at-5.11.17-PM
Viewpoint: No, sugar doesnโ€™t โ€˜feedโ€™ cancer โ€” common cancer myths, debunked

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.