Edging toward Agriculture 3.0: Genetics, irrigation and fertilization are improving—Is that enough for the leap forward necessary to feed the world?

AQP2ASFBRrTEfTPsdW5aK-A5vp7vnlP4GQqJYeWDK5-crAjtFKmbUb-hxbfR7l5_8nT5xTd-CZI6mOFZvYs-qZzhYyc2mlRZ_Z1YTCRDhPmjpbUMncLzurTW9-oTsIgtMxWXZpQNNr4Z-XnwzR1Q-lqLNjMI2g
Sometime in the 1980s, an unprecedented change in the human condition occurred. For the first time in known history, the average person on Earth had enough to eat all the time.
Depending on their size, adult humans need to take in about 2,000 to 2,500 calories per day to thrive. For as far back as historians can see, a substantial number of Earth’s inhabitants spent much of their lives below this level. Famine and want were the lot of many — sometimes most — of our species.
Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
Almost one out of ten people still do not get enough to eat. But hunger today is generally due to low incomes and poor food distribution, rather than failing to grow enough food. Farmers produce enough for everyone, but not all get what they need. Still, our daily lives are nothing like those of previous generations.
What happened? Modern agriculture.
Today, Farming-2.0-style agriculture — which began with innovations in field crops like wheat but spread to other parts of farming, such as cattle ranching and chicken-raising — is by almost any measure the world’s most critical industry.
The sheer scale of Farming 2.0, with its giant farms and giant firms, has led food consumers increasingly to mistrust the industry. They don’t believe these enormous, profit-making enterprises have their best interests at heart. The mistrust is aggravated by the very success of modern agriculture, which has made it possible for much of the world’s population to live without having any connection to the farms and farmers who provide their food.
The next task for the next generation of farmers, researchers, and agricultural companies will be to maintain the gains of the past for all these new people while preserving the environment for the future.
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.