Is Elon Musk’s Grok-4 AI anti-semitic?

Credit: Creative Commons
Credit: Creative Commons

In a series of posts on X, the AI chatbot Grok apologized for what it admitted was “horrific behavior.” The mea culpa came after a 16-hour spree where Elon Musk’s chatbot posted antisemitic content, praised Adolf Hitler, and even referred to itself as “MechaHitler” — exposing the dangers of training AI on “all of the internet” that includes data increasingly dominated by extremist content.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

During [a] livestream, Musk said that, according to his “biological neural net,” AI systems should be optimized “to be maximally truth seeking” and encouraged “to be truthful, honorable, good things—like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.”

The inflammatory posts came days before the launch of its next version, Grok 4. On July 4, Musk had announced that Grok had been improved “significantly,” promising users would “notice a difference when you ask Grok questions.” They certainly did. 

According to xAI’s investigation, specific instructions caused the problematic behavior, including: “You tell it like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct,” “Understand the tone, context and language of the post. Reflect that in your response,” and “Reply to the post just like a human, keep it engaging.”

These instructions made Grok prioritize engagement over safety, causing it to “ignore its core values in certain circumstances” and “reinforce any previously user-triggered leanings, including any hate speech in the same X thread.”

The incident reveals the problem with AI systems that are trained on content from the internet without proper red teaming and guardrails.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
psychedelics ptsd neurosciencnews public
Chaos or at peace with the world: The complex ways psychedelics transform the brain
Diet Soda with Measuring Tape 2
Science challenges anti-soda activists: No, sodas won’t make you fat
Rustic Skillet of Raw Brains
‘Weird food’? Testicle- and brain-eating, supplement-gulping MAHA health food enthusiasts defend their ‘natural’ diets
Strawberry Clamshell with Warning Sticker
Viewpoint: Activists hype ‘dangerous level’ of pesticide residues in Driscoll berries: Separating health concerns from fear-mongering
Silhouettes Beneath the Mosquito Nets
Guinea-Bissau halts widely condemned RFK Jr.-backed vaccine trial that would have withheld life-saving vaccines from thousands of newborns
Nutrition and Supplements Infinity Collage
Drugs and supplements can extend life and five other longevity myths
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 5.38
PFAS in Agriculture: Science, Uncertainty, and Risk Communication
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.