7 year study of the effects of GMO corn on primates shows what every other study has found: ‘No significant health risks’

Credit: RawPixel via CC0-1.0
Credit: RawPixel via CC0-1.0

A study spanning more than seven years has found no significant health risks associated with the long-term consumption of genetically modified (GM) maize in cynomolgus macaques. Conducted across two generations of the non-human primates, the research assessed the impact of GM maize on immune responses and metabolic health.

The study evaluated a GM maize line containing insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant traits (cry1Ab/cry2Aj and G10evoEPSPS genes). In both generations, the researchers performed detailed analyses on immunoglobulin profiles, cytokine networks, and serum metabolome characteristics. While some minor differences in blood and metabolic parameters emerged, none were deemed biologically or clinically significant. The research also ruled out concerns related to chronic inflammation, autoimmune responses, or toxicity from GM maize.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The findings provide substantial evidence to support the global body of research on the safety of GM crops. While the study did not assess cellular and mucosal immunity, it establishes a methodological framework for longitudinal safety assessments of GM crops. The researchers conclude that the prolonged consumption of GM maize poses no significant health risks.

A version of this article was originally posted at ISAAA.org and is reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit both the GLP and original article. Find ISAAA.org on X @isaaa_org

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.