25 years ago, India approved GMO rice and was poised to be the developing world’s crop bioengineering innovator. What went awry?

Credit: Annadatha via CC-BY-2.0
Credit: Annadatha via CC-BY-2.0

In the early 2000s, India’s fields promised to become laboratories of the future. When genetically modified (GM) cotton was approved in 2002, the air was thick with possibility.

Few innovations have sparked as much debate globally as Golden Rice, engineered to produce beta-carotene, the precursor of Vitamin A. In countries like the Philippines, it was seen as a potential weapon against Vitamin A deficiency, which causes blindness in children.

India, too, has millions of children suffering from micronutrient deficiencies. Yet despite extensive trials, Golden Rice never saw the light of day in India.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The reasons behind India’s hesitation are layered and complex. At one level, it is about trust. Food in India is already viewed with suspicion. Consumers worry about pesticides, adulteration, artificial coloring.

To introduce something that carries the tag “genetically modified” was bound to trigger unease.

At another level, the paralysis is political. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee may recommend approvals, but the final word often rests with ministries wary of public backlash. … The result has been decades of regulatory freeze, where science says one thing but politics decides another.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claims? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
ChatGPT Image May 14, 2026, 09_51_35 PM
Facebook swamped by hundreds of thousands of scam ads for illegal or dangerous medical products
ChatGPT Image May 12, 2026, 01_21_30 PM
How big health brands are funding online medical misinformation 
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.