Should we use CRISPR gene editing to remake humanity?

Credit: EPFL
Credit: EPFL

โ€œWe are as gods and might as well get good at it,โ€ Stewart Brand,ย the free-thinking philosopher of technology, wrote in 1968. Itโ€™s a remark that could apply to nuclear weapons,ย artificial intelligence, space travel or climate change mitigation. But perhaps it is what happened in 2012 that fits it best: the invention of the Crispr technology ….

The implications of gene editing are huge. Almost any inherited disease could in theory be corrected and therefore not passed on. Many other illnesses โ€“ chronic, acute or infectious โ€“ might one day be combatted with precisely targeted therapies. Immune cells to fight cancer may be precisely programmed.

Outside human medicine,ย cropsย andย farm animalsย are already being protected from diseases, given nutritional improvements or endowed with higher yields.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The speed at which gene editing has progressed in just 13 years since Crispr was invented is only the start. As the tools of gene editing grow smaller, more precise and capable of carrying larger cargoes, so the god-like power human beings will hold in their hands to direct evolution toward beneficial ends will be immense.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.