Can culture evolve through natural selection?

Gemini_Generated_Image_xkok9cxkok9cxkok

For well over a century, Darwinโ€™s theory of natural selection has served as biologyโ€™s grand unifying framework, explaining how species adapt and evolve through the differential replication of randomly generated variations. Given the success of the theory of natural selection in biology, itโ€™s natural to wonder whether it might explain another kind of evolution we see all around us: that of human culture.ย 

Cultural innovations such as technologies, artistic styles, and social practices build on earlier ones, and tend to benefit their bearers, and become more useful over time. Culture exhibits cumulative, adaptive change; it evolves. The question is: How? What kind of scientific framework can accommodate it?

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Culture doesnโ€™t face the problem Darwinโ€™s theory was designed to solve, the problem of how change accumulates despite acquired changes getting obliterated each generation. Once someone invented a teapot handle, teapots could thereafter have handles. If we apply natural selection to culture, weโ€™re trying to use a framework specifically designed to explain evolution in systems where acquired traitsย arenโ€™tย transmitted, to explain evolution in a system where theyย are.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-10_29_11-AM
Whatโ€™s behind Anthropicโ€™s warning about the accelerating development of AI
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-16-2026-10_01_45-AM-2
Viewpointโ€”Recursive self-improvement: AI leader Anthropic calls for AI slowdown
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-10.02.22-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Industrial foodโ€™ primerโ€”Challenging the dangerous delusions of the alternative food movement
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-11.57.12-AM
Viewpoint: Raw milk and the myth of safetyโ€”ProPublica exposes the growing anti-homogenization movement
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-02_31_28-PM-2
Trump-appointed cancer panel head backed by supplement and anti-vaccine companies promotes discredited support forย ivermectin as a potential cure
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-03_07_27-PM
AAP v. Kennedy: While a court challenge grinds on, RFK Jr. quietly advances his anti-vaccine conspiracy agenda
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
newborn infant baby mother
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: The truth about vitamin K shots
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-11.23.32-AM
In a rebuke to RFK, Jr.โ€™s anti-vax crusade, journal retracts study claiming hepatitis B vaccineโ€“autism link
ChatGPT Image Jun 16, 2026, 12_03_37 PM
Kennedy accused of trying to โ€˜bullyโ€™ science journal that retracted study linking vaccines to infant deaths
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.