China’s 5-year plan to accelerate science innovation is putting the U.S. and Europe in the rearview mirror

China is pouring money and political muscle into science, and the gap with the West is closing fast — by some measures, it’s already gone. As Nature’s Xiaoying You reports, the country’s latest five-year plan calls for major investments in fundamental research and pledges to fast-track frontier technologies such as artificial intelligence, quantum applications and controlled nuclear fusion by 2030.

In 1978, Chinese researchers published fewer than 120 papers in international journals — 0.02% of the global total. Today China leads the world in patent applications, and in 2024 it passed the United States as the largest R&D spender when adjusted for purchasing power, according to the OECD. Beijing aims to grow R&D spending by at least 7% a year through the decade, even as the Trump administration seeks to cut US science funding.

“For the West, if competing with Japan in the 1980s felt like weathering a storm, then China will bring a tsunami in the years to come,” says Yanbo Wang, a science-policy researcher at the University of Hong Kong.

Part of China’s edge is staying power. “China’s centralized system allows it to focus resources on long-term scientific goals more effectively,” says Zhang Lin, a science-policy researcher at Wuhan University. That consistency shows in semiconductors, where a state fund’s third round will distribute 344 billion yuan (roughly $50 billion), and in AI, where DeepSeek’s low-cost large language model rattled global markets in 2025.

Weak spots remain. Basic research made up just under 7% of China’s R&D budget in 2024, versus 14.4% in the US. And a publish-or-perish culture rewards volume over originality — a Nature investigation of retractions found that nearly 60% of papers retracted between 2014 and 2024 included authors with China affiliations.

Related on the SLP

Viewpoint: Researchers claiming living near nuclear energy causes cancer botched their research Viewpoint: Opposing expanding nuclear energy production—Here’s what left-wing junk science looks like

Genetics of IQ: At what age do various forms of intelligence peak?

‘They’ve already decided what they want studies to say’: Questioning Trump’s plan to study whether people distressed about their sex are prone to violence

Himalayan and other specialty salts are cool, but they contribute to dangerous iodine deficiency. Here’s how iodized table salt helped raise America’s IQ—and why it still matters for your health

“But a large volume of papers won’t necessarily lead you to groundbreaking original discoveries that can win you a Nobel prize or a Turing Award, for example,” says Li Jizhen, an innovation-policy researcher at Tsinghua University.

Read the original article here