The race to genetically engineer babies

Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape

A biotech entrepreneur has raised $30 million to launch Preventive, a public-benefit company dedicated to studying whether gene-edited babies can be made safely—the largest known investment yet in the field of heritable genome editing, as MIT Technology Review’s Antonio Regalado reports.

Founded by gene-editing scientist Lucas Harrington, a cofounder of Mammoth Biosciences, Preventive will research modifying embryo DNA to correct harmful mutations or install protective genes. In a blog post announcing the venture, Harrington pledged not to rush, committing instead “to rigorously researching whether heritable genome editing can be done safely and responsibly.”

The stakes are high. The first scientist to create gene-edited babies, China’s He Jiankui, was imprisoned for three years, and the procedure remains illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Still, Harrington argues that if it proves safe, it “could become one of the most important health technologies of our time,” and he estimates editing an embryo could cost only about $5,000.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Preventive is the third U.S. startup this year to chase the idea, after Bootstrap Bio and Manhattan Genomics. None has significant staff or facilities, and mainstream gene-editing scientists remain unconvinced. Fyodor Urnov, a gene-editing expert at the University of California, Berkeley, said the latest launch made him want to “howl with pain.” When Manhattan Genomics approached him, he replied: “I encourage you to stop. You will cause zero good and formidable harm.”

Preventive’s backers are largely undisclosed beyond SciFounders, a venture firm Harrington runs with partner Matt Krisiloff. Enthusiasm has grown among crypto figures, including Coinbase founder Brian Armstrong. Will Harborne, a crypto entrepreneur and partner at LongGame Ventures, calls the technology’s use a “societal obligation.”

Harrington hopes Preventive can coax quieter supporters into the open. “Most scientists I speak with either accept embryo editing as inevitable or are enthusiastic about the potential but hesitate to voice these opinions publicly,” he said.

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Smiling-Woman-Over-Teal-Abstract-Shapes
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director
Screenshot-2026-11-03-at-12.31.18-PM
Gene editing once viewed with suspicion by UK  farmers, upwards of 90% now open to their sustainability benefits
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape
The race to genetically engineer babies
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-11.18.34-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Just the flu’: Skipping your child’s flu shot could be a fatal mistake
Screenshot-2026-11-02-at-11.34.28-AM
Farmers are collateral damage in the PFAS “forever chemicals” crossfire. Here’s what they need to know.
Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 10.32
“Do your own research”: What Medicare’s annual open enrollment circus teaches us about the seductive trap of DIY health and science
Red and Green Embroidered Campaign Caps
Viewpoint: The fragile (and often bizarre) MAHA-MAGA-far left health-and-chemicals coalition is fracturing. Here’s why
Glossy Plastic Bag of Tokens and Labels
Viewpoint: How CNN got played by environmental activists pushing a plastics scare and litigation agenda
Screenshot-2026-10-21-at-11.30.51-AM
Viewpoint: Yes, our food system stinks, but the attack of ultra-processed foods is often misplaced
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.