The following is an editorial summary of a longer story.
This blog post combines two competing views on the nature of mental health research: should we be trying to change the way we classify and treat these ailments on a biological basis, or is the current methodology of psychiatry fundamentally sound?
View the full story here: Do we need to change the way we are thinking about mental illness?
 |
Infographics | More... |
30 years later in Romania: What happened to the babies deprived of human contact? 
Is tilapia a human-made freak that we should avoid — or an evolutionary rockstar? 
Tucker Carlson’s ‘science’: UFOs are piloted by ‘spiritual entities’ hiding on Earth and Darwin’s theory of evolution is not true because ‘God created people distinctly’ 
From 72 to 400: US announces expansion of number of agricultural chemicals it will monitor 
Viewpoint: Here’s why the European Parliament’s plan for loosening crop biotech editing regulations is two steps forward, three steps backward 
Talking trees? Do they quietly communicate through an underground fungi network? Here are the facts 
Andrew Wakefield and the fabricated history of the alleged vaccine-autism link 
Embryos aren’t female by ‘default’ after all, study shows 
Debating sustainable agriculture: Weed management and crop biotechnology 
How Freddie Mercury got his voice: It wasn’t his teeth 
