Media missed important message when covering Angelina Jolie’s preventative mastectomy

c e b o
Image via Forbes. Credit: AJ Alfieri-Crispin/Flickr based on an original photo by Todd Heisler for The New York Times

After Angelina Jolie’s New York Times op-ed detailing the reasons for her preventative, bilateral mastectomy, I expressed concern that some women with breast cancer might conclude they weren’t doing enough to treat their own disease. The average breast cancer patient, or typical woman assessing her breast cancer risk, might not be able to accurately gauge how their risk of cancer or recurrence compares to Jolie’s relatively rare case.

Jolie’s revelation was widely reported by the press and received as a positive message on personal responsibility in health care. But two papers published online last week in the journal Genetics in Medicine raise important concerns about accuracy of newspaper reporting on celebrity medical issues and the overall benefit of such high-profile commentary to public health education.

Read the full, original story here: How the Public and the Media Got Angelina Jolie’s Breast Cancer Message Wrong

Additional Resources:

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standard—Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.44.09-PM
Viewpoint: Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario. Is that proof that climate change is a hoax, as Trump claims?
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: “Turn on, tune in, drop out”—Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-3.33.44-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccine deniers are attacking a life-saving Vitamin K shot for newborns that isn’t even a vaccine
Screenshot-2026-06-11-at-3.40.06-PM
'Toxin' detox: A gastroenterologist weighs in on $71 billion health trend
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Screenshot-2026-06-11-at-4.00.17-PM
Gen Z burned by sunscreen misinformation and tanning myths
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-1.35.30-PM
Viewpoint: Social media and fake natural health propaganda fuel surge in use of mostly useless supplements
Credit: ACSH
Viewpoint: Who and what’s to blame for the surge in vaccine-preventable diseases?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-10-2026-12_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: Why gene-editing babies is moral and certain to happen
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The ‘shoddy’ Danish couple whose 'research’ inspires RFK, Jr.’s health delusion
Screenshot 2025-08-25 203032
Mazzenga’s 20-year old muscles: How a still-going-strong 92-year old sprinter wins every race she enters
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.