Viewpoint: Why consumers will ignore new ‘bioengineered’ labels

Credit: Alamy
Credit: Alamy

The USDA’s mandatory labeling for bioengineered crops (f/k/a GMO) went into effect January 1st. But will it actually change consumer preferences and shopping habits? According to a study from Cornell University, probably not.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Companies have the option of simply adding a QR code on their packaging. Shoppers have to actively take the step of scanning the QR code and reading the information to learn whether the product contains any bioengineered products. So without a visual cue (even the sunny and warm BE labels) the vast majority of consumers will never even realize it’s there.

There was another unsurprising aspect to this as well. When there was a debate about GMO labeling in any particular jurisdiction, Google searches about GMOs increased. But as soon as that debate was over, the interest waned as well.

…

And that explains why some groups aren’t happy about the BE label: it isn’t going to scare people. They were hoping for a skull-and-cross-bones label. They spent years demonizing biotechnology and they’re angry the government doesn’t want to use the-long-maligned term GMO. Just remember: if people are scared, they aren’t donating money to activist organizations!!

That’s precisely why I’m such a fan!

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Neon Syringe Portrait with BPC-157
Viewpoint: Peptides and medical freedom: The MAHA obsession that can damage your health
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-07-29 at 10.40
The COVID vaccine turbo cancer scare is back. Science still proves it’s wrong.
Screenshot 2026-10-28 at 10.11
We're likely over-consuming the world's most profitable nutrient – and it’s wrecking our waistlines.
Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 10.32
“Do your own research”: What Medicare’s annual open enrollment circus teaches us about the seductive trap of DIY health and science
Screenshot 2026-10-20 at 1.37
Race against food rot: How AI and gene editing could slash fruit and vegetable waste
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-10.31.49-AM
Solar engineering to cool the planet might well work. Could it touch off a geoengineering arms race?
Strawberry Clamshell with Warning Sticker
Viewpoint: Activists hype ‘dangerous level’ of pesticide residues in Driscoll berries: Separating health concerns from fear-mongering
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.