Pesticides cause prostate cancer? Cedars Sinai Medical Center epidemiologist criticizes ‘biased’ ecological study

Credit: Medical Xpress
Credit: Medical Xpress

A recent study published in Cancer, an international interdisciplinary journal of the American Cancer Society, concluded that there is an association between pesticides and incidences of prostate cancer. 

Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment-wide association study

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, yet modifiable risk factors remain elusive. In this study, the authors investigated the potential role of agricultural pesticide exposure in prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest a potential link between certain pesticides and increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings warrant further investigation of these specific pesticides to confirm their role in prostate cancer risk and to develop potential public health interventions.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

______________________________________________________________

Expert reaction to study suggesting [an] association between many pesticides and prostate cancer

A study published in Wiley Cancer looks at an association between pesticides and prostate cancer incidence.

Prof Paul Pharoah, Professor of Cancer Epidemiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, said:

“The epidemiological design used to evaluate the association between pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality in this study is called an ecological study.  In an ecological study, the unit of analysis is the population in a given area, and so the correlation studied is that between pesticide levels in a given area and prostate cancer rates in the same area.  It is important to note that pesticide exposures and prostate cancer occurrence in individuals was not studied.

“Ecological studies are very prone to bias and can give rise to the ecological fallacy – the assumption that group-level correlation also applies to individuals. Ecological studies are generally regarded as hypothesis generating rather than hypothesis testing.  The well-known mantra that correlation does not mean causation is particularly applicable to ecological studies.

“While several associations were identified, no data to suggest that these associations are causal is presented.  It is notable that of the four pesticides associated with both incidence rates and mortality rates of prostate cancer three are considered by the Environmental Protection Agency of the USA as not likely to be carcinogenic or have evidence of non-carcinogenicity.”

Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
close up arabica coffee farmer s hands picking beans plant his farm colombia
Viewpoint: Why do so many ‘mainstream’ and ‘respected’ media outlets exaggerate climate change threats?
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
diversity
We are entering a new era of personalized medicine—if you’re white

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.