What would the effect on US agriculture be on farm profits and climate change if glyphosate is banned?

What’s a future without glyphosate look like?

How about a nearly $2.9 billion drop in net farm income, food inflation more than doubling, and an additional 33.72 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year, for starters.

The grim details were spelled out in a new report from The Directions Group, which highlighted farm bill programs and the role of crop protection tools. It identifies the significant impacts on the farm bill and federal ag policy that would erupt if U.S. farmers lost access to glyphosate — the nation’s most-used herbicide.

Related on the SLP

New Zealand scientist challenges ‘scaremongering’ about herbicide glyphosate Viewpoint: Aftershocks from American Academy of Pediatrics attack on glyphosate—‘Misinformation about the genetic engineering of crops hinders the development of sustainable agriculture technologies’

Challenging creation of a ‘vaccine injury clinic,’ NIH research scientists rebuke Kennedy for politicizing and undermining science

How the “wellness” movement has turned into a rigid cultural belief system

Vaccines, religious freedom, and protecting children’s health: New York Amish appeal to Supreme Court after $118,000 in vaccine fines for blocking shots

“Conflicting state and federal pesticide labeling requirements could create a challenging regulatory landscape for crop protection products,” said Mark Purdy, executive vice president of agri-food at The Directions Group. “That’s why this research is critical. It shows that losing access to glyphosate could create far-reaching consequences for the farm bill.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here