Sure Genomics whole-genome direct-to-consumer test pushes regulatory limits

AAEAAQAAAAAAAANpAAAAJDYwOGNhMGE LWMyNGQtNGQ ZS hNjQwLTA ZjMxNmVlNGU MA

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Sure Genomics, a startup based in Utah, launched a genetic testing service today that costs a whopping $2,500 upfront, with an additional $150 subscription fee that guarantees DNA analysis updates every six months. The price is unusually high for a direct-to-consumer genetics company, since 23andMe and Ancestry offer genetics reports for $199 and $99, respectively. But Sure Genomics says it’s worth it; customers who pay the fee will get their entire genome sequenced, and unlike others, the startup says it won’t sell anonymized genetic information to third parties to turn a profit.

But from a regulatory standpoint, Sure Genomics is treading on thin ice. The FDA has warned similar companies about telling people their disease risk or how their bodies might respond to a drug. Sure Genomics plans to deliver exactly those kinds of results — without getting clearance from the FDA first.

It’s been three years since the now-famous genetics company 23andMe first received a warning letter from the FDA telling them to stop marketing its Personal Genome Service. At the time, the FDA said that some of the intended uses for the service — uses like determining a person’s drug response or their genetic risk for breast cancer — were “concerning.” The FDA feared patients could be put at risk if they received incorrect test results, or if they didn’t understand the results they got.

Read full, original post: Sure Genomics wants to sell private genetic profiles for $2,500, but it’s really testing the FDA

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Personalized-Cancer-mRNA-Vaccine-Vial
Personalized mRNA vaccines are poised to revolutionize cancer treatments. Here are the barriers.
Screenshot-2026-10-11-at-10.24.21-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s new CDC head Erica Schwartz greenlights hepatitis B vaccine study critics call “unethical and designed to cast doubts on its safety”
Screenshot-2026-10-05-at-11.57.44-AM
Scaremongering or legitimate safety concerns? The political dogfight over America’s food safety system
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
Open-Menthol-Cigarette-Pack
How the tobacco industry conspired with conservative activists to kill the Biden administration’s proposed ban on menthol cigarettes 
Screenshot 2026-10-12 at 12.25
Tearful onions? CRISPR has a solution for that
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
Eating Nuts Adds up to Longer Life x
For millions with peanut allergies, Nurtured Nuts’ CRISPR gene-edited peanuts could ease the fear of accidental exposure
Deepfake Democracy Media Mosaic
31 states have passed a patchwork of laws to limit election deepfake commercials. They’re not working very well.
Screenshot-2026-10-08-at-1.23.28-PM
Countries around the world are rushing to pass teenage social media bans. Could they backfire?
generated-1790707585414
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it
AI-Force-Uniform-Insignia-Close-Up
Trump wants an AI Force like Space Force, but that could make AI’s risks harder to manage
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.