Scientists must lead human cloning stem cell debate

The following is an edited excerpt.

Last week’s announcement in Cell that a team in Oregon successfully derived stem cells from a cloned human embryo raises many questions. Researchers must do their best to answer them and If they do not, they risk creating an environment of fear that distracts from the real debate and sets back research.

The reaction to the Oregon team’s success has been predictably mixed. Some have lauded the achievement, others have been less enthusiastic. “Barbaric,” wrote one critic. Another called it a “terrible injustice”.

The ethical questions introduced by the new work are serious matters and deserve consideration, but these issues should be considered in the context of the current research and re-evaluated as the work advances.

Read the full story here: Scientists must ensure that they take the lead in the ethical debate surrounding the therapeutic use of stem cells derived from human clones

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.