Unreliability of genome assembly contest results prompts soul-searching

In July 2011, as part of a “Assemblathon” contest, 21 teams submitted 43 attempts to build assemblers to assemble three genomes from scratch: that of a bird (budgerigar), a fish (the Lake Malawi cichlid) and a snake (the boa constrictor).

But different assemblers – and the same assemblers in the hands of different teams – did not give consistent results. And that’s the same thing that happened in previous contest.

Bioinformatician C. Titus Brown of Michigan State University wrote on his blog that “as a field, we have pretended that genome assembly is a reliable exercise and that the results can be trusted; the Assemblathon 2 paper shows that that’s wrong.”

Read the full article here: Genome assembly contest prompts soul-searching

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: What are mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and how do they work?

Infographic: What are mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and how do they work?

As of 1 December 2020, thirteen vaccines have reached the final stage of testing: where they are being given to ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend