Smithsonian’s genetics exhibit inspires mixed review

NewScientist Smithsonian
Image via New Scientist. Credit: Donald E. Hurlbert and James di Loreto/Smithsonian

Dehydrated DNA isn’t much to look at. Yet it unites humans, animals, plants, fungi and microorganisms, making them what they are.

Building an engaging show around something that is crucial and yet fundamentally unexciting to look at is a brave and problematic endeavor. The organizers of the Smithsonian Institution’s exhibition called Genome: Unlocking Life’s Code try hard to compensate for the visual shortcomings of their subject, offering lessons in how the human genome relates to our health, medicine and ethics, and how the genomes of humans and other creatures compare.

But the exhibit’s explanations of how the human genome actually works flounder.

Read the full, original story here: DNA fails to take off

Additional Resources:

  • Genome: Unlocking Life’s Code, Smithsonian Institution
    Learn about the Human Genome Project and click through materials at the exhibition website.
  • Science marches on,” Washington Post
    In this article, the reviewer offers a more positive review, and notes that the exhibit raises more questions than it answers–not necessarily a negative in a museum exhibit.
  • Our Lives on a String,” Wall Street Journal
    Julia Klein links the complexity of questions raised in the exhibition to the complex questions raised by June’s supreme court ruling on gene patents.
Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
ft covidresponseus feature

Video: Viewpoint: The US wrote the global playbook on the coronavirus and then ignored it

A year ago, the United States was regarded as the country best prepared for a pandemic. Our government had spent ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend