DNA matches narrow possible crime suspects, but that’s not proof

Though for most people the mention of the words “DNA” and “match” in the same sentence means “guilty”, a Stellenbosch academic believes that there are many uncertainties in DNA-based evidence.

“The advantage of DNA information is that it narrows the size of the pool of suspects. But, usually, we don’t know who the other people in the pool are,” said Dr Arnold Muller, a professor in the department of mathematics at the University of Stellenbosch.

Muller said forensic scientists estimated that the probability that someone else would have the same DNA profile as that of the sample obtained at a crime scene was one in 2million.

“Given the present size of the South African population (about 52million), there could be up to 27 people in the country whose DNA profile matches that of a sample found at a crime scene,” he said.

Read the full, original story here: Whose DNA is it anyway?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claims? The evidence says mostly the opposite
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.