FDA asked to approve “three-parent” IVF

dnajoshm
Credit: Flickr/Josh*m

In a public meeting scheduled for February 25-26, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will consider approval of experiments to produce children by the in vitro fertilization of an egg containing DNA derived from both the intended mother and another woman.

Although such large-scale genetic engineering has never before been attempted in humans, the procedure — to create “three-parent babies” — is paradoxically being touted by its developers as a relatively trivial tweaking of the reproductive process to enable women with compromised eggs to become genetic mothers of unaffected children. These claims of high impact health benefits from a low-risk procedure cannot be squared with scientific reality.

We do not know nearly enough about the process of embryonic development for the FDA to even contemplate approving this procedure.

Read the full, original story: FDA Asked to Approve Creation of Genetically Modified Children

Additional Resources:

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

d a ca e c c beb x
Facts & Fallacies podcast: The 'woke' crusade against anthropology? Dr. Elizabeth Weiss
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-03_00_23-PM
World’s first AI-designed vaccine explained
DtAieAIkCZy-uchn-oqg
Viewpoint: In the science misinformed grifter game plan, the organic-food-is-healthier myth might be the worst.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
chjpdmf zs sci pbwfnzxmvd vic l zs ymdiylta l zsmtu nty otkwmtetaw hz uta a dzjyy euanbn
Technical milestone or designer baby obsession: Latest gene-editing advance reignites a familiar ethical debate
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-10.48.33-AM
700,000-person study reaffirms that getting a flu and Covid shot on the same day is safe
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-03_07_17-PM
Kennedy blocks preventive health care panel that reviews treatments for HIV, diabetes, and cancer from meeting — for fourth time
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-10_27_31-AM
Viewpoint: Europe clears the way for gene-edited crops — but fear-driven restrictions still slow their full potential
Picture1
Viewpoint: The Lackland flu outbreak is fading but Hegseth’s military anti-vaccine fiasco is not
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-01_04_14-PM
Viewpoint: How politicized science became a political religion 
Screenshot 2026-07-08 at 10.13
What happens when a pro-life congresswoman needs an abortion?
GMOprotest
Viewpoint: CRISPR-hating activists air their grievances about gene editing farming innovation
Screenshot-2026-07-06-at-12.58.18-PM
Viewpoint: Oxygen chambers? Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy? The only thing biohacking improves is the bottom line of preventative medicine hucksters
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.